Tweaking A Victorian Permit: Secondary Consent Or A Section 72 Amendment?

Victoria Permits: Secondary consent is fast — until it is challenged

Victoria is good at letting you change your mind. The question is how much of the permit you reopen when you do. A small change to endorsed plans — a slightly different driveway crossover, a relocated window, a revised roof form — can be dealt with cheaply under a condition. Treat it as the wrong kind of change and you are into a section 72 amendment with notice, referrals and a program hit.

For a Think Property Club student, this is a sequencing decision rather than a paperwork one. Get it right and the builder never stops. Get it wrong and an objector, or a council officer on a bad day, stops a project that was three weeks from practical completion.

The deal question

You hold a Victorian permit and the design has to move. Can I use the consent mechanism already sitting in my permit conditions, or must I amend the permit itself? And if I must amend it, what does that cost me in time and exposure?

The checks a student would run

• Read the condition. Find the exact words: typically the plans must not be altered without the written consent of the responsible authority, or a matter must be to the satisfaction of the responsible authority.
• Diff the plans. List the differences between the endorsed plans and what you want now, in planning terms — setbacks, height, car parking, materials, landscaping, access.
• Apply the Westpoint test. Planning Victoria's guide sets out the four principles: no transformation of the proposal, no authorisation of something requiring a fresh permit, no consequence to the purpose of the planning control, and consistency with specific permit conditions.
• Check for new provisions. If the planning scheme has changed since the permit was granted, the change may now require a new permission regardless of the condition.
• Confirm council practice. Read the responsible authority's published guidance for amendments, and expect to lodge a current title and a cover letter describing the change for a section 72 route.
• Map the review exposure. Decide now whether the change could attract a third-party review, and what that means to your program.

The order and reasoning behind the checks

Start with the condition wording because it decides whether secondary consent is even on the table. Then diff the plans, because the scale of the change decides the route. Then test the four principles, because council applies them and the Tribunal has endorsed them. Only then look at program and review risk, because by that point you know which process you are pricing.

The trap or expensive mistake

The trap is treating secondary consent as a fast lane with no consequences. Planning Victoria's Guide to Victoria's planning system warns explicitly that responsible authorities need to consider secondary consent carefully, because if it is later found to be inappropriate or inconsistent with the permit an affected person may ask for the permit to be amended under section 87. A cheap consent that gets overturned is the most expensive option on the list.

The mirror-image trap is over-lodging. Councils such as Melbourne and Manningham publish guidance for both routes, and a developer who lodges a section 72 amendment for a genuinely minor change pays for notice, referrals and a longer assessment, and creates a fresh avenue for third parties to have a say on a change that would otherwise have passed quietly.

What the rule actually means

A section 72 amendment is an application to amend a permit, including any approved plans, drawings or other documents, and it follows the same process as a permit application with the same notice and referral requirements. What makes it tolerable is scope: the assessment focuses only on the amendment and avoids reopening every issue associated with the approved use or development. Secondary consent is different in kind. It is a less formal planning approval available under a permit condition, and the Planning and Environment Act 1987 framework gives applicants review rights to VCAT for both routes, with third parties having review rights on an amendment but no formal right of objection or merits review on a secondary consent. Planning Victoria's Chapter 5 on reviews records the practical deadlines: an objector review must be made within 28 days of the notice of decision, and an applicant review where the permit was refused or conditions are challenged must be made within 60 days.

What the result means for feasibility and the offer

Model the change against a simple illustration: a three-dwelling infill project where the approved plans are revised to move a driveway and alter one façade. Secondary consent, if the condition supports it, is an administrative step measured in days to a couple of weeks with no notice and no third-party review. A section 72 amendment brings notice, referral, a longer assessment and, where an objector is engaged, a possible VCAT review that runs into months.

The cost difference is rarely the fee; it is the delay and the risk of the permit condition changing. Add a line to your contingency for program delay of four to eight weeks per amendment round, and treat any third-party exposure as a probability, not an exception. Where the change is material to the value of the project, the honest answer may be a fresh permit application or a redesign that stays inside the existing permit.

The Think Property Club lesson

Ask which permission the change actually requires, and write down the evidence for that answer before lodging. That is the same discipline students apply to feasibility: define the question, run the checks in order, and make a decision you can defend in a document rather than a feeling.

Practical checklist and next steps

• Quote the permit condition you intend to rely on, verbatim, into your file notes.
• Prepare a one-page schedule of changes against the endorsed plans for the council officer.
• Test each change against the four principles before you lodge anything.
• Check whether any provision introduced since the permit now requires a fresh permission.
• Model both routes in your program and carry a contingency for review; keep the amended plans and any consent in writing with the permit records.

Learn with Jason & AmyBuild practical small-scale property development skills with experienced mentors.Enquire now